|
|
|
|
|
by brikis98
3725 days ago
|
|
> So, yeah, Agile requires safety; but, before that, it requires commitment. Completely agreed. There are certainly tools and processes that are more effective than others (as I discussed in the post), but for a creative discipline like programming, no process or tool will be effective unless the creators (the programmers) buy into it. That reminds me of a quote from Peopleware: > The maddening thing about most of our organizations is that they are only as good as the people who staff them. Wouldn't it be nice if we could get around that natural limit, and have good organizations even though they were staffed by mediocre or incompetent people? Nothing could be easier—all we need is (trumpet fanfare, please) a Methodology. |
|
(You can create systems for enabling median folk to accomplish things, even if they are disinterested. We call it "bureaucracy", and it sucks, but a lot of the time it kinda-sorta works. A bit.)
Anyway, as usual: you need good people, good process and good tools.
None of these are substitutable for the others, despite what methodologists, tool vendors and various worthies might tell you.
[1] http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?HighDisciplineMethodology