|
|
|
|
|
by wooster
3732 days ago
|
|
The study shows no lesions on the Kilimanjaro trek, which is more akin to an EBC trek than to climbing Everest, even if you climb Kala Patthar on the EBC trek. Even then, Kilimanjaro is much more intense than hiking to EBC, and a lot more people proportionately get some sort of altitude sickness on Kilimanjaro due improper acclimatization. Honestly, if you want to hike to EBC, I'd worry more about the flight into Lukla. Or edema from AMS. (I've climbed a "trekking peak" [Lobuche East] in Nepal as well as Kilimanjaro.) |
|
Kilamanjaro is 5895 metres, and EBC is 5380 metres.
You're correct that in the study, the Kilamanjaro climbers (n=7), most of them came back with normal brain scans. That is definitely encouraging.
Also, I have heard that Kilamanjaro is tougher than EBC, due partly to the rate ascent and people pushing themselves too aggressively - if I was to do EBC, I'm happy to take it slower, to avoid AMS. I'll probably be taking diamox, but I don't know if that makes a difference here.
(I did the Inca Trail to Macchu Picchu with a group, fairly aggressive pace, but it's considerably lower - although I just Googled and apparently the highest point on the trail is 4215 metres, so maybe not that different).
There may be hope yet...haha.
How did you find your trek via Lobuche East? Any ill effects? And you found it easier than Kilimanjaro?