[andrewstuart]

>> but that they should be protected from instability.

Appropriate protection is a warning in the docs "this code might change when the spec is finalised".

Inappropriate protection is hiding those features away behind difficult-to-configure barriers making it only possible for experts to configure their systems to run it.

[thejameskyle]

We did have those warnings in the docs. I wrote those warning. No one paid any attention to them.

I hate to say it, but you really don't know what you are talking about.

[dang]

> I hate to say it, but you really don't know what you are talking about.

Please refrain from getting personal in arguments on HN, even though it's frustrating when someone doesn't know what they're talking about.

This comment would be great with just the first paragraph.