|
|
|
|
|
by WorldMaker
3746 days ago
|
|
Following the Dispute Resolution Policy [1], NPM would have been CCed on the entire chain. This is tl;dr item #2 right at the top: «2.Email the author, CC support@npmjs.com» Given other context in the exchange, I would give Bob the benefit of the doubt that he followed Item #2 here and did CC NPM in this discussion. Additionally Bob is correct that as soon as the F-bomb was thrown it was a clear intent by Azer not to deal amicably with the situation and also a clear violation of the Code of Conduct [2], which is not mentioned in this article because it is directly invoked/linked in by the Dispute Policy, but is also applicable to the actions taken here. [1] https://www.npmjs.com/policies/disputes
[2] https://www.npmjs.com/policies/conduct |
|
KIK|Bob never intended to act amicably and, in fact, admitted as such in cold text.
>We don't mean to be a dick about it, but...
NPM seems to have ignored this blatant violation of their dispute policy and didn't even engage in conversation.