|
|
|
|
|
by greglindahl
3748 days ago
|
|
Sorry, do you think the first example shouldn't be subject to opposition? The search warrant could still be over-broad or defective in one way or another, even if it jumps through the CALEA hoops and was signed by a judge. The concept of "valid" that you're using is fuzzy and unclear. I agree that the second case - court order to create new software - is a lot more obvious and clear, and deserves opposition in court. The reason I'm being so pedantic is that it's important to disagree with the notion that corporations should roll over in any situation that involves claims of terrorism. Lots of people think that, but it throws away an important part of our legal system. |
|