[_wmd]

Writing a 15 line function shouldn't grant someone the right to break an entire language ecosystem

I think the real issue though here is technical - does npm really allow mutation of published assets like this? That's a shitty situation that can only lead to unreliable builds

[mathetic]

First, you should never have a dependency for 15 lines.

Second, you sound just like people when pointed at modern art says "I could have done that" and I believe the correct response is "you didn't."

[_wmd]

Pray tell, what is the minimum size that should be required before permitting a dependency? Constant-time string compare is only 5 lines or so, should we cutpaste security critical functions too? "We ran your code on $new_arch and discovered a timing attack." "It's not my fault!@# The professionally maintained and reviewed implementation was too small to depend on!@#!"

[simoncion]

> First, you should never have a dependency for 15 lines.

If those 15 lines are called throughout your codebase, you should do what? Re-write the 15 lines and stuff them into a lib that you maintain? And everyone else should do this, too?

If a library is widely useful, it's widely useful regardless of how many LOC it contains.

[esailija]

Yes. With dependency you are giving up control and in return you save time in not having to implement the dependency. If the LoC is small you get practically nothing in return and so the only reason to do it is ideological.

Many times it is even faster to write a trivial "module" yourself than even discover it on npm, let alone reading and verifying it. Hell, NPM 3.x is so slow that it's literally faster to write any 1 liner "module" than it is just to install it.

"Reuse" is just a means to an end, it doesn't make sense to do it only for its own sake.