|
|
|
|
|
by felisml
3739 days ago
|
|
"False positive" has a precise meaning in statistical analysis. The second thing you're talking about is useful to know, but calling it the false positive rate is just wrong. "Out of 1000 positive tests, 50 were false positives, 950 were true positives" - valid statement. "The false positive rate was 50 out of 1000" - abuses a common technical term in a way that sounds valid on the face of it, but which is potentially VERY misleading. We can't even calculate a valid false positive rate from the above data, since that requires taking the ratio vs. all tests and not just positive tests. |
|
I don't see anything here that definitively clarifies which of the 2 scenarios above it can exclusively be applied to.