You didn't answer the question. I'll take that as a "no".
My point is that the properties of each paperclip are unique. Trying to make the sort of extrapolations between paperclips that you tend towards (misery poker) is not an exercise that leads to improvement for anyone.
Sure there are: It shall be unlawful to conduct a restaurant or other place for the serving of food in the city, at which white and colored people are served in the same room...
So apparently all paperclips are unique, some move by themselves, some don't? Then how can rayiner so confidently assert that the state of the black paperclip is entirely caused by what happened 50 years ago?
Did you post the wrong link? There is no mention of a definition of colored, or any mention at all as to what sort of impact Jim Crow laws had on Asian immigrants. The website solely talks about Caucasian and Black. Your angle here is disingenuous: if you actually thought Jim Crow directly impacted Asian communities you wouldn't have left that out of your original argument about the terrible things that Korean immigrants have faced. ("Korea was dirt poor (think worst part of Africa levels) since forever, then a war, then refugees into the racist US.")
Yes, every individual person's experience is unique. However, that was not my point. My point was that the typical Korean immigrant's experience is a different situation than the typical experience of an ancestor of an African-American today. (Call it two brands: the general "Korean-American" paperclip, and a general "African-American" paperclip.)
Korean immigrants and their descendents, simply put, were and are in a different situation than African-Americans or their ancestors. Some parts of either of their situations are outside the control of individuals.
Can you say with a straight face that 200 years of legalized segregation, and concomitant economic starvation, should disappear ("unbend") within 60 years of it being de facto uplifted?
I imagine Koreans didn't move to Virginia after the war.
I thought "colored" == "not white" was common knowledge, but if you want a specific definition, take Virginia:
For the purpose of this act, the term “white person” shall apply only to the person who has no trace whatsoever of any blood other than Caucasian; but persons who have one-sixteenth or less of the blood of the American Indian and have no other non-Caucasic blood shall be deemed to be white persons.
Colored explicitly includes "Negro, Mongolian, American Indian, Asiatic Indian, Malay".
As for whether I believe human populations can rapidly rebound, the answer is yes. I believe this because so many human populations have actually done this. I've cited many examples and they in addition to suffering poverty and oppression far worse than any in the US, they also satisfied your criteria of having Jim Crow laws applied to them in the unlikely event that they were permitted to enter the US.
My point is that the properties of each paperclip are unique. Trying to make the sort of extrapolations between paperclips that you tend towards (misery poker) is not an exercise that leads to improvement for anyone.