[__david__]

It's interesting to see this looks like it was drafted by a Time Warner Cable employee, and yet my twc internet still doesn't support IPv6. Though it gives me hope that maybe it's coming soon?

[nandhp]

If your equipment is all IPv6-capable, you may just need to have swap out your modem. Time Warner Cable has achieved 100% IPv6 availability (possibly excluding certain phone customers):

http://www.timewarnercable.com/en/support/faqs/faqs-internet...

[jepler]

.. except no static ipv6 even for commercial / business class users? wt---

[wtallis]

What's the point? The addresses TWC assigns are extremely stable in my experience. Are you trying to run a public-facing DNS server or do you have some other need to hard-code IP addresses?

[abstractbeliefs]

Well, DNS needs you to "hard"code the IP addresses you are available at against your domains.

Before you suggest DDNS, for some companies, the length of unavailability between a changed IP and the DDNS client noticing and updating can be fatal.

[pyvpx]

why are they hosting services on their dynamically addressed business line? everyone offers static addressing on business lines. it's a completely rip off; and conveniently makes the proper route -- colocation, a dedicated server, "the cloud" -- more financially sound.

[danyork]

The draft is written by a Time Warner Cable employee, Lee Howard. Lee has been an outspoken advocate for IPv6 for many years and has been very involved with TWC's rollout of IPv6. (I am a TWC customer and did get IPv6 in Keene, NH, about 2 years ago.)