[mangeletti]

It's worth noting that Bonefish Grill operates a "managing partner" system, vs an ordinary franchise. The corporation owns 85% of the business, while a location's managing partner (who invests some money to get started) owns 10% (a regional manager owns the other 5%).

IOW, they're not, strictly speaking, a franchise.

[gist]

What is the upside for owning only 10%? Seems that the only asset that you have is that interest which you can sell to someone else, that is managing partner, with approval of corporate.

In the bonefish grill's that I have been at (several), the managing partner is typically present at the restaurant when I have been there. As such this is in a sense like buying yourself a job. (You could say the same about some franchises but somehow I see this a bit differently..)

[mangeletti]

I agree. The benefit of this system is primarily that of the corporation. You get a manager, sell them a small percent, which helps cover some (a small amount) of the location's launch costs, gets the manager committed and makes them feel like a real owner, which makes them focus on success much more... with little serious upside. Not to mention, it puts the manager at a financial loss (their initial investment), if they quit within 5 years.

I knew a managing partner of a Carrabba's. He quit something like 2 years later and bought this little burger drive through. It must have been really bad at Carrabba's...