|
|
|
|
|
by coldtea
3748 days ago
|
|
You would have a point only if X was smaller (or at least equal) to size, complexity etc to Y + Z. And the whole point of TFA is that this is not the case. You can argue that it is, but not without getting into specifics. Merely asking how can 2 things be simpler/smaller/better than 1 thing without taking into account what those 3 things are, makes absolutely no sense. |
|
So I'm unsure what kind of complexity you're adding by using it. Mental? Spiritual? Metaphysical?