Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by cpeterso 3745 days ago
How does an unusable page like this even pass preliminary design review? Perhaps the page works well on the 16-core desktop computers with giant monitors common in the ivory tower.
5 comments

I'm not going to defend the design choices here but it performs fine on my four year old laptop running Firefox/Ubuntu, so it requires neither a very powerful hardware, nor Chrome which is a more common failure mode.
Runs like a bag of shit on my specced out Macbook Pro in Chrome.
On my very beefy computer, but with a 10 Mbps connection the experience is kind of shitty - it takes around half a second after a "scroll" for the content to appear.
It runs fine on my "ancient" 2008 TP X200. The problem is the hijacking of scrolling, and the back button...
I agree. Viewed it on a chromebook and the site performance was fine.
It's sluggish on my desktop i7/970 combo.
I made the mistake of clicking on the link while my kids were playing Minecraft PvP in the next room. Cue anguished shouts of "I'm lagging!" for the 30 seconds or so I spent staring at the loading icon.
7 year old iMac with a dodgy GPU, and I crashed and burned. Can only run in safe mode now.

While this is a not-uncommon occurrence for me, it's really freaking annoying.

iPhone 6S Plus - mobile safari crashed 3 times before I gave up
It doesn't crash on my iPhone 6 Plus, but it's practically unusable. 5-10 seconds of waiting for it to respond to trying to swipe down, and horrible frame rates while it does so.
Yep, totally broken for me on iOS.
3 year old MBA, Safari and it runs well.