|
|
|
|
|
by dspillett
3750 days ago
|
|
That would concern me too potentially, though if there isn't one already it should be easy to implement a switch that would turn this part of the behaviour off. It looks very interesting to me from the point of view of dealing with certain data types better (at all, in fact), and handling circular references. |
|
I think it's one of those "easy on the surface, but surprisingly complex" problems.
When you start allowing arbitrary code execution, it's a lot of work to prevent certain "functions" (i mean that in the non-programming way).