[Alex3917]

If they're going to video the interview and make it public then there needs to be a minimum cap that's publicized on the website. Fair is fair.

This is pretty clever though, can't wait to see where it goes.

[tyingq]

The prominent placement of the "didn't fund this company" videos seems a bit harsh, there's even a red background striked text label showing you how much they were denied.

This particular thumbnail caught my eye...ouch: http://i.imgur.com/03f63JZ.png

[Alex3917]

Sure, that's their marketing. I don't think it would be unfair if the terms were reasonable, right now they're not. But if there were a minimum cap and we were talking 3 months of funding instead of one month then this would totally be a viable option. Maybe not a first choice option, but at least a reasonable backup plan.

[dyeje]

Ironically, that particular interview is pretty positive.

[partisan]

It is in poor taste, for sure. That said, I am now watching that video to understand what went wrong.

[neves]

Looks like a Trump company: you are fired!