|
|
|
|
|
by futunet
3760 days ago
|
|
What would constitute evidence of corruption? * Allowing the most invasive of all the ad trackers to be members of Acceptable ads? (Criteo: Yes, they're a member) * Allowing the most ubiquitous ad trackers to be members of Acceptable Ads? (Google: Yes, they're a member) * Allowing the advertisements of companies owned by their investors to be members of Acceptable Ads? (Sedo: Owned by Tim Schumacher -- Yes they're a member) * Allowing cheesy "native ads" site-spam to be part of Acceptable Ads? (Taboola. Yes, they're a member.) * Gouging publishers for an absolutely absurd pound of flesh? (The rate is 30% of ad revenue for blocked ads. Insane!) I could go on. There's a lot wrong with the program. |
|