|
|
|
|
|
by xaduha
3756 days ago
|
|
> That's basically the argument to use Windows and Windows-based technology and not Linux. Not today it isn't. Years, maybe decades ago it could be. What Linux containers do is help to remove the barrier that various distributions introduced, it makes things more accessible and it's more lightweight than using virtualization. Centos, Alpine, Ubuntu, whatever. As long as it is in a container I can work with it. I can even run some Windows binaries with Wine inside a container. rkt is largely compatible with Docker infrastructure, so that too is fine. But what jimktrains2 suggesting is complete opposite of that, it reduces options. |
|
Personally I'd consider having familiarity with more than one platform would increase one's options.
But ultimately having other solutions on the market is a good thing. Not only because no one solution is the best at every metric (be it stability, security, speed, memory usage, nor any specific requirements), nor because different solutions can appeal to different personalities. But mostly because different solutions might solve a problem in a unique way that the competing solutions may not have considered - often in ways that can ported and thus benefit the competitors and wider community.
So I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss anything that's outside your field of expertise.