Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by aakilfernandes 3765 days ago
If he creates his own blockchain, he has to pay to mine that blockchain.
3 comments

If all he wants is for users to be able to send kudos back and forth, he could make the difficulty trivial, mine a few million/billion coins on a network of 1, and then distribute as he sees fit.
If the difficulty is trivial, there's no point in a blockchain since you can double spend cheaply
Then simply hike the difficulty way up afterwards.
Hike the difficulty, how? Hard fork? And even if you could hike difficulty with consensus, then you'd be locking yourself out of mining any new blocks, and your blockchain would stall! An altcoin is not a good solution for the proposed use case.
Then nobody can mine new blocks (not profitable enough).
More energy would be used up by the ethereum network to verify this token rather than an individual hackspace miner, so it should be cheaper than buying ether.

Another choice is PoS; one of the tutorials I listed is for a PoS coin. Yet another choice is instamining/pre-mining.

But I could set the cost of mining low enough to make it feasible no? Seems like the attraction of creating an altcoin vs using Ethereum is that it's a simpler system. If I am not interested in leveraging the existing networks, that might be a better way to go?
It depends what exactly the point of this token. To be honest, it seems like just having a spreadsheet makes more sense than a blockchain
Haha, yeah, I've been thinking that too. I was kind of more looking at interesting applications of blockchains but it seems like this isn't really the best use case.