|
|
|
|
|
by dimman
3768 days ago
|
|
Yeah I noticed that it sounded like I misunderstood you, however I did not. Lets just get it straight: I agree with you and him that it would be a lot nicer to let the user choose to enable this, and definitly not make it impossible to disable. With that said, I'm still not sure that the author actually understand the technology behind or how it works. Reading David Qu's answers they just align with what I'm saying about the technical part though. No matter what the author says, I think it's easy to misunderstand the text and make it sound like the manufacturer are doing something unsafe... |
|