|
|
|
|
|
|
by 6stringmerc
3775 days ago
|
|
|
Nah I mean I just read it and it basically gives the impression that there's no merit to the claims and any and all results are subject to personal interpretation. Or, to put it in more simple terms pending peer reviewed, refereed scientific findings, Brain.Fm is the HeadOn of audio. |
|
|
Honest to god we just used a standard one we got over a decade ago, and customized it with our name. We might have even gotten it off of legal zoom or something.
- The HRV/(stress/anxiety) study is peer-reviewed (and independent, we had no part in it).
- All our other papers are pending publication.
- Giovanni's work on acoustic stimulation is peer reviewed, and from Northwestern. Again, we had no part in that.
- The meta-analysis one of our previous neuroscientists made is also peer reviewed.
- Dr. Olmstead's paper is peer reviewed, so's the Fatigue one we have up there, and all the other ones in our bibliography: https://www.brain.fm/pdfs/ResearchLibrary.pdf
- Hell, we're even having our statistical user analysis peer reviewed, the one we have up (before we got popular) and the new one we're making now.
Tryin' our best here :)
- Adam