|
|
|
|
|
|
by pnwhyc
3767 days ago
|
|
|
I think it's reasonable to say that the HN crowd is predominantly more educated on this matter than the average American. We are not the target audience of this letter. Neither is Apple. Comey is playing on the emotions and technological ignorance of the bourgeois. He refers to brute force hacking as, "...try to guess the terrorist’s passcode..." Then he plays on Americans' current distaste for large corporations and says that the, "American people," need to decide whether this is right or wrong. No, we don't. Every cryptologist, cyber-security expert and halfway decent IT is saying that this is a catastrophic proposal with the power to mutilate the fourth amendment and send a whole Jenga tower of rights tumbling after it. It shouldn't even be a question. The FBI appears to be using this tragedy as a trojan horse by which to commit atrocities upon our crucial freedoms. No, our thoughts and prayers are not enough, but our privacy and security is far too much. |
|
|
Maybe, but it's fun to discuss, and there are enough of us spread throughout that can educate on this single issue. It's pretty easy for me to explain to my non-tech friends the implications of what the FBI is asking. Word of mouth travels fast and I would give pro-encryption the upper hand in this "debate". I have not heard anyone outside government protesting that Apple yield on this issue and I doubt I will.
In fact, the only ones who speak up against encryption are those who do not listen to the people. Since they're supposed to represent us, they will be very easy to not vote for.
Like you said though, it isn't even a question, encryption is here to stay whether the American government permits it or not. Ironically, by putting up such a fight, the government is simply telling criminals where the weak points are in law enforcement, and are thus empowering criminals.
I hope our government can have a good sit down with tech company leaders and experts in cryptology. Despite Comey's request to have an open discussion, they seem to be excluding this group. It's apparent from his discourse, Hillary's, and Obama's that they've spent no time sincerely listening to anyone with any knowledge about the benefits of encryption. The "conversation" he so desires has only happened in Washington among people with no tech background. Presumably there will be some public hearings coming up.