Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by post_break 3773 days ago
I've never heard of someone needing a phone to stay on while changing the battery.
5 comments

Few people may _need_ for a phone to stay on while changing the battery, but is a huge plus. I spent over a year on a phone that could hot swap a battery if you do the swap smoothly, and avoiding the need for a reboot was definite pleasure.
My last iPaQ could do this trick. There was a button cell NiMH next to the LiIon cell to keep it going.
Well as the article points out, adding modules involves taking out the battery. There might be other design options besides an extra battery/super capacitor, but it kinda weakens the utility of quick change modules.
> Well as the article points out, adding modules involves taking out the battery

Are those modules hot-swapable? If the hardware and/or software does not support hot swap, there is a distinct possibility that they intentionally designed it this way: i.e. you have to power down before replacing modules. It would not be much more difficult to switch to "push-to-eject" battery mechanism which would make powering down optional when changing modules. Food for thought.

I bet a huge majority would prefer it. It's just not really been a sensible compromise, so no one even thinks about it.
Of course they would prefer it, if there were no trade-offs. But as you point out it's not currently sensible.
It's pretty common in enterprise-grade handhelds like Windows Embedded devices to include a little bridge battery.
I switched from Android to iPhone and hence had to switch from swapping out batteries to plugging in an external battery. Now I'd never go back, the whole reboot/swapping procedure is kind of a PITA