|
|
|
|
|
|
by sarciszewski
3776 days ago
|
|
|
Cryptocat was not secure. No argument there! Decryptocat was the proof in the pudding. If a secure product could be as user-friendly as Cryptocat was while still being secure, then most peoples' communications would be more secure. That's all I was saying. I'm not trying at all to hand-wave the proven insecurity. I'm saying that the only thing they got right was the one thing that secure products have consistently gotten wrong. (Barring Signal.) |
|
|
That's my main claim. Usability and setup phase were between 90-100% of my positive remarks on it in my review. I just added it still has value for crowds without tech-savvy opponents if (a) they won't use truly secure stuff due to hassle and (b) they are clearly informed usable but weak tools can be breached. As one of a few interim solutions if nothing else.