|
|
|
|
|
by creeble
3774 days ago
|
|
Um, wow. Nice work. It does illustrate (duh) that by not encrypting their wireless coms, their system is vulnerable to straightforward reverse-engineering of the RF protocol. It also illustrates that this vector isn't much of a threat for your average burglar. However, between the two threats, it wouldn't take a genius entrepre-thief to make a simple device and sell it to thieves (like the ones that exist for some cars). A million customers someone said? |
|