Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by growlix 3771 days ago
The security architecture described here seems pretty clever. Is this degree of security unique across mobile devices? If the phone in question was from a different manufacturer or ran a different OS, would the FBI have to ask its creator for help?
1 comments

Chrome OS was already doing chain of trust booting when it was first announced/revealed/open-sourced, but with maybe a hardware switch to enable flashing other loaders. (Since then that has been probably removed.)

There are Android full disk encryption schemes, and of course phones with signed bootloaders.

https://nerdland.net/unstumping-the-internet/pattern-unlock-...

http://www.extremetech.com/mobile/216560-android-6-0-marshma...

What Apple did that was so valuable is providing a very clear, almost abstract implementation, from scratch, hitting every point along the way (randomized device private keys, read and execute only Secure Enclave, signed loaders, proper AES(-XTS?) full disk encryption, probably also requiring strong a password too, full lock after ~48 hours - sure, it'd be good if this could be customized to something lower).