Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tanlermin 3781 days ago
Yes...but one that is also very fast, portable and with great generic programming.
2 comments
andybak 3781 days ago
I had never considered Julia as a general purpose language. I assumed it was targetted mainly at data science etc.
link
ced 3781 days ago
The core language is general purpose, and IMO really good for high-performance work, but the community is focused on numerical code, so there aren't a lot of libraries for non-numerical/scientific/financial work at this point in time.
link
21 3781 days ago
Stuff like Numba greatly decreases the need for Julia.

C++17 also feels surprisingly dynamic, and together with Cython for easy Python-C++ interop also decreases the need for Julia.

And reports from the Julia world are not exactly encouraging - http://danluu.com/julialang/

link
aut_dan 3781 days ago
That report is over a year old, which for a 4 year old language is a very long time. The top comment in [1] is from a week ago and highlights why it is now mostly invalid.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11070764

link