|
|
|
|
|
|
by fixermark
3774 days ago
|
|
|
That's a pretty significant special case though. I'd be willing to go with the advice "If you get as big as Google's codebase, be sure to trim the dependencies on your statically-bound languages too." But you probably have a ways to go before that's an engineering concern for your project. (... note that one could make a similar argument for more runtime-dynamic languages. I won't disagree, other than to observe that as a lone engineer, I've managed to code myself into a corner with dependencies in Rails ;) ). |
|
|
The amount of time I've seen wasted trying to scale to Google is insane. People should worry about what Google does when they work for at least a billion dollar company.
For most projects import as many dependencies as you can as you are getting free labour. Sure, once in a while you'll fuck something up and waste a week or two, but it pales in comparison to the months you didn't spend reinventing the wheel.
No one really ever notices that it's all the companies with boat loads of cash that have massive technical debt. Even with the example at Google the first thing I'd try is jamming more memory in those machines, keep going until the linker needs more than 256 GB.
Fuck, Facebook still uses PHP, the stock market doesn't seem to care.