|
|
|
|
|
by softyeti
3785 days ago
|
|
On one hand, yes, I think you can say that to be a winner, you had to dope. But if you took all of the dopers out, we would still have a winner. Consider Cadel Evans. In my opinion, I don't think he doped. He was always in the conversation with Vinokourav, Ullrich, and the other top guys. For years. He eventually won, but the sport was much cleaner by then. I was a huge Armstrong fan. When I heard that Hincapie admitted to doping, I knew it was over. Over because Hincapie was always Lance's right-hand man, and also over because Armstrong wouldn't go after Hincapie. I think Armstrong was one of the best cyclists ever, but he is tarnished now just like the others. It's a cruel sport. |
|