[lubujackson]

"Coding" has nothing to do with network security or the intricacies of programming languages or using computers. At its core it is simply a extension of logic operations (if...else, loops, recursion, etc.) with variable manipulation (moving data around). It SHOULD be a fundamentally taught disciple, NOT because people need to code but because most people should have enough recognition in their lives to understand when something could or could not be managed programmatically.

Learning math in school is not something most people use everyday, that is true. And most people forget all of the formulas they memorize. BUT, if I am trying to figure out which peanut butter is cheaper per ounce I can do some simple math to figure it out. If I am trying to figure out the height of a tree I remember "oh there is some geometry formula for this" and can go look it up. What we need in the modern era is more people to have that base level of knowledge so they can say "rather than doing this spreadsheet every month, can't we just hire a programmer to automate it?" because right now a ton of repetitive crap work is being done simply because no one knows any better.

[sundaeofshock]

What you are talking about is a cost/benefit analysis, which does not require knowledge of programming.

You are also making an assumption that tasks are not being automated because business people do not how to write a line of python/ruby/Java/whatever. Maybe they have limited funds and they are focusing their expenditures in revenue generating work. Maybe the RoI is far in the future that it does not make sense. Maybe they need to be able to change formulas on a moment's notice, so they don't want to be beholden to a developer.

A CEO needs an understanding of their business and a high-level understanding that computers are capable of automating tasks. If coding skills are needed, the CEO can hire a CTO in the same way they hire a CFO to provide accounting skills.