|
|
|
|
|
by morgante
3778 days ago
|
|
> My point was that I don't find it particularly analogous to the Eich case. I think there's been a miscommunication, because neither do I. They're fundamentally different cases, in that I think the NSDAP should have the legal right to march but they can absolutely be punished socially. Likewise, I think what happened to Eich was perfectly legal but not necessarily moral. They're not the same and that was my point: invoking "free speech" as a Constitutional right has no bearing on the Eich case. |
|