Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by brandon272 3786 days ago
There is absolutely nothing "obscene" about $40/year ($3.33/mo) for a premium upgrade on a freemium app that has had thousands of hours and plenty of blood, sweat and tears invested into it.

Frankly, I find your comments bordering on disrespectful to the developers and probably depressing to anyone who tries to earn a living developing software.
1 comments
AznHisoka 3786 days ago
The "thousands of hours and plenty of blood" sadly doesn't factor into whether you should pay $40/year for it. It's about the value it provides and OP thinks it's not worth that much to him.

Don't try to make this into a moral argument.

link
brandon272 3786 days ago
> The "thousands of hours and plenty of blood" sadly doesn't factor into whether you should pay $40/year for it.

It speaks to the breadth and quality of the app. The investment of time matters. I pay for Office 365 and Adobe Creative Cloud and the huge investment of time to create the products within those suites is the basis of the whole product. It's what I'm paying for.

It goes without saying that if you do not use this product or have no use for this product, you would not pay anything for it, much less $40 a year. But if you are an actual user of this product and it provides value to you, it is simply ludicrous to say that a $3/mo. commitment to it is "obscene".

link
mistermann 3786 days ago
They might make more $ if they had some sort of a tiered pricing model, $40 is "too much" for me to spend on a TODO list as well.
link
brandon272 3786 days ago
Perhaps you're right. From my perspective, $3/month just seems fairly inconsequential to me if it's a good app and I use it frequently.
link