| No, this is incorrect. Firstly, the debt burden is only diffused because those "mustache twirling CEOs' decided it should be. Pensions used to work just fine before they were financialised by sharks. So did insurance. No one sane should be trying to increase the returns on a pension fund by gambling on student debt, on real estate loans, or on consumer credit. That was exactly the approach that caused the implosion of 2008 - or more specifically, it was "mustache twirling CEOs" hiding the fact that the investments they were selling as a sure thing were junk loans with a cheap wood veneer. Secondly, even if this wasn't true, the social and economic costs of an economy that runs on usury instead of productive investment are so predictably crippling that the hair cut, with associated uncontrolled demolition, will happen anyway. A debt jubilee would do a lot to restore confidence, because everyone will be able to stop looking nervously at everyone else's obligations and wondering if they're going to be able to meet them. Instead, some realism will be restored to book values. This would still be cataclysmic, because the financial industry needs to understand that it can no longer run on cocaine and bullshit. But it won't be the financial equivalent of a self-inflicted nuclear strike, which is a real possibility as things stand today. |
Oh yeah, I'm sure the creditors will be highly confident about future lending after a jubilee, because they went from wondering if debt will be repaid...to knowing it won't.
Where do people come up with this stuff?