|
|
|
|
|
by vidarh
3781 days ago
|
|
> Why should they? Because it quickly became clear that the alternative was not to be able to interview him, and they have a legal duty to seek justice. Justice has not gotten done by refusing their best opportunity to interview him. > Their usual process is for the fugitive to be brought to a convenient location in Sweden for questioning. Yet they deviate from this regularly, and actually did so in another case during Assange's extradition hearings. |
|