|
|
|
|
|
by codexon
5975 days ago
|
|
> Plus the story is about removing those with dissenting views from a social invitation only event in a private location. Just because the event was hosted in a private location does not make it a private event. Just because a supermarket or restaurant is privately owned doesn't make it a private service. Saying that it does allows people to selectively discriminate based on race. Yes I would maintain my view if they were merely attending the speech and not being a nuisance: which is the case in this article. |
|