Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by wkubiak 3794 days ago
From the text: "uClibc 0.9.33.2 (Buildroot 2015.02)"

In all fairness, this can't be from mid-2014 if they used a library build from 2015.

1 comments

So why are both musl and glibc from mid/early 2014, and dietlibc from 2009? That's an awful lot of cherry-picking versions with no stated justification.
I think it's because those are the freshest stable versions the author could use? uClibc 0.9.33.2 by itself was released in 2012. I guess he had a reason for using the BuildRoot 2015.2 version.