|
|
|
|
|
by bane
3798 days ago
|
|
I think analog31's answer gets to the gist of it for me. Lots of kids have a very hard time understanding how math is relevant to them beyond basic arithmetic and a little algebra. However, it's important enough that we dedicate all of k-12 to teaching it. Yet, computation is basically what runs the world and there's immediate and gratifying application for even very simple and low levels of it. Students learning about computation...and what's computable...can relate to it much more readily and can start looking for applications of this knowledge much more readily than what they learn in mathematics. But the two subjects are married at the hip (like literature and history) and one can readily lead into another if they're both present. Just as important, the tools that exist for exploring computation are really quite good these days and students can do some really cool stuff if the environment is well structured. Imagine sitting down in a class and the assignment is to use Python to build a simple sentiment analyzer. Classroom materials are a list of scored sentiment words and a few dozen excerpts from literature or news. Or reinforce mathematics lectures on probability by building a bloom filter. K-12 education on computation, if done well, could help tie together many of the other subjects that students are taught and provide immediate application. (imagine if the assignment for a 10th grade art class was to produce a demoscene demo!) |
|