|
|
|
|
|
|
by seivan
3799 days ago
|
|
|
Yup, that's what I would like. It's silly to remove the point from the method name and not makes it into a named argument that could be overloaded for others. I might just do that for my own stuff. I don't like the notion of the first argument not being in either the method name or as a named argument. |
|
|