Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jacquesm 3793 days ago
I doubt it matters to anybody but was it really necessary to kill the fish?
2 comments

Watch it until the end :)
Haha nice catch. I missed it originally thinking it would just be more marketing crap. So, they probably just moved it before detonating. Not sadistic bastards after all.
Watch 'The Prestige'.
I know... My original reply mentioned two scenarios with one having replacement fish. Then, I thought people would think I'm overly paranoid or negative. I just couldn't help wonder if they'd blow the fish for fun then avoid liability with similar looking ones. Then, I edited the comment for sake of presumption of innocence.

But, yeah, I hear you... Great movie as well. One of few that brings my favorite mad scientist into eye of mainstream audience as well. I doubt I must name him. :)

EDIT to add: I'm guessing you think the geeks were too sadistic to pass up the opportunity, eh?

> I'm guessing you think the geeks were too sadistic to pass up the opportunity, eh?

No, it just seems weird, that's all. I don't see how either interpretation would benefit HP.

Oh OK. Makes sense.
I did, but unless the whole video was a fake it doesn't really matter does it? And if it is then that does not reflect well on HP either...
I didn't think about the image angle. Yeah, you'd think a marketing person would be like, "Wait, this could lead to a PETA lawsuit and lower sales. Not to mention our segment that likes fish."
Dude, I was thinking the same thing! That was seriously f*ed up. They should've left some cool fireworks or something left-over from July 4th. Or some safe-ish chemical that would make colorful smoke. All kinds of tricks you can do without killing live animals.

I mean, I've heard about things so wrong and ease it's like shooting fish in a bucket but... exploding fish in a datacenter? That's on another level.