[marcosdumay]

It may be incredibly powerful (for what use case?) and everything. But it's an incredibly bad rich text editor.

Word can't keep a list straight.

[FussyZeus]

That's akin to saying "this screwdriver sucks as a hammer." You're using it wrong.

[mikeash]

When you go to the hardware store and ask for something to pound nails, they give it to you. When you ask people what they use to pound nails, they say they use this. When you're hired to pound nails, they often insist that you pound nails with this. 99.9% of the people who use this on a regular basis use it exclusively to pound nails.

Given that context, it makes little sense to say, that's unfair, it's really a screwdriver.

[FussyZeus]

If 99% of the contractors on the planet were using screwdrivers as hammers, the 1% are the ones using the proper tool for their job.

Consensus =/= Fact in every scenario.

[mikeash]

My point is that not only do roughly all the users use it that way, but the make agrees with that usage.

At some point you just have to say, this hammer, while apparently designed as a screwdriver, is clearly labeled, sold, purchased, and used as a hammer and is not very good at it.

[Dr_tldr]

So would you say that your description and expectation of how people use Word matches Microsoft's marketing materials for it?

[emodendroket]

Who cares? I thought we were talking about the quality of the tool and not the marketing.

[Dr_tldr]

Nope, read all the comments above to understand why you're drawing a false distinction and missing the point here.