[azylman]

> If they had to reclass as employees, they would just raise prices to end consumer 10-20% to compensate (or fund it via other's money like they're doing now to price out rest of market).

I think saying that they would "just" raise prices 10-20% is trivializing the problem. One of the reasons that Uber took off was because it was so much cheaper than regular taxis. Would Uber look the same now if it had had 20% higher prices from the beginning? Almost surely not.

[tzier]

If their costs had been 20% higher, they still would have priced others out of the market by using VC money to subsidize (as they still do now). Technically their prices were higher than cabs, since they were only black cars for the first two years.

I personally never take cabs anymore even if they're cheaper, the Uber experience is 10x better IMO. The only time I'll consider it is when I use Flywheel on NYE to avoid surge pricing.

[rayiner]

I take Uber almost daily from the train to my office because it's about 30% cheaper than a cab. If it wasn't I'd just grab a cab at the cab line. It's so much easier.

[harryh]

Of course if uber has to raise rates because their employee costs go up, you'd have to expect cab companies to do the same because all their employees aren't getting benefits either.

[tyingq]

They are, however, paying their portion of the payroll taxes, disability, unemployment, etc. And perhaps softer benefits that still have costs, like paid time off.

[harryh]

I am nearly certain that's not true in the majority of circumstances. Cab drivers are generally self employed and issued 1099s not W2s.

[mc32]

I think what happens in the media is small outfit bias.

Über is big, so what they do must be judged in that light, yellow cab is small, so they get a pass even though they engage in similar practices.

I listen to NPR and they had a bit about über and them being "unfair" to drivers, but never was that compared to how drivers are treated at yellow cab for example. So, because they are big they are looked at more suspiciously, plus they are "tech" so there must be a bad angle there somewhere. People have a thing for underdogs, I do too, but not so much in this case because cabs can often be worse for the drivers, at this time. No telling in the future when automation takes over. The point will be irrelevant then.

[tzier]

You're correct - taxi drivers have been suing for decades to get employee status. You don't hear about it because Uber is the first major national player that everyone recognizes.