|
|
|
|
|
by chaostheory
3802 days ago
|
|
Even if his employer did want to patent his work, considering Salk's huge fame at the time (the guy's a modern dragon slayer), it wouldn't have taken much to convince his employer otherwise. A few interviews here and there and the public outcry would be huge. |
|
> No one knows why the lawyers considered a patent application, but it seems likely that they would only have used it to prevent companies from making unlicensed, low-quality versions of the vaccine. There is no indication that the foundation intended to profit from a patent on the polio vaccine.
Why would the public be in an uproar about using patent protections to keep low-quality vaccines out of the market, while otherwise making the license available at no cost?