[macintux]

When you have $200 billion dollars lying around, you can do multiple things simultaneously.

When you have $200 billion dollars lying around and your business is dramatically undervalued, it would be practically criminal not to buy some of it back, to save on dividend payments if for no other reason.

[jonknee]

> When you have $200 billion dollars lying around and your business is dramatically undervalued, it would be practically criminal not to buy some of it back, to save on dividend payments if for no other reason.

Who's to say Apple is undervalued? It's one of the most widely held companies and they have been so for several years. Tim Cook doesn't know what's going to happen in China. Their US sales were down in Q4 2015 and they are forecasting global sales to be down in Q1 2016. They may have been spending billions buying back shares at an all time high.

[macintux]

It's hard to imagine a scenario where Apple has peaked. Even replacement sales would sustain a healthy business, and they have extremely high satisfaction and retention rates.

People value what Apple offers. A global depression could hurt the company badly. Anything short of that should allow them to keep making money. A bad Apple quarter is still lots and lots of money.

[jonknee]

> It's hard to imagine a scenario where Apple has peaked. Even replacement sales would sustain a healthy business, and they have extremely high satisfaction and retention rates.

It's not that hard, their largest growth market (by far) is a huge question mark. It's tough to rely on a single product that is expected to be replaced every year. There will be a ton of pressure on the iPhone 7.

[scarface74]

Apple's services revenue is growing every year. As long as their installed base keeps growing or even remains stable they can make money off of their existing customers. They aren't in the position of other phone manufacturers or computer manufacturers - with decreasing margins and only being able to make money at the point of sale.

It was reported that the average selling price of iPhones was up by $3 and would have been up by $80 if it weren't for currency fluctuations.

[ksec]

Well Apple dont need to pay dividends, it never was a dividends stock until recently. The whole notion of buying back stock just to save a few dividends sounds silly to me.

I really wish someone enlighten me why, why spend 183 billion on share buyback and dividends when it has nearly no use for the stock price, and no real use for the company long term etc.

[jbverschoor]

For employees and to take the company private again

[forgetsusername]

>your business is dramatically undervalued

You must know something that millions of other sophisticated people don't.

[macintux]

2008, Apple was trading at $12 (split-adjusted) and nearly every careful observer of the company knew that was stupidly low based on the trajectory of the iPhone.

Relying on the stock price as a valid indicator of the value of a company is a fool's errand, regardless of the "sophisticated people" trading it.