|
|
|
|
|
|
by nonbel
3798 days ago
|
|
|
>"If you're right and CRISPR doesn't actually work, then none of the papers published so far are replicable and you'll be vindicated in mere months." Not at all. I'm not sure you understand what I am saying. It appears to me the data can be interpreted in multiple ways. Two different "theories" can explain the same results. This is a much more insidious problem than mere non-replication (I haven't seen any direct replications regarding CRISPR either though). People can continue on the wrong path for a long time by interpreting good, reliable data incorrectly. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experimentum_crucis |
|
|