[at5]

Making the point that views of Stalin and Churchill are quite far apart from each other despite similar actions. Churchill denied food aid from other allied countries that wanted to feed the starving in Bengal. His role went beyond prioritizing his country over the colonies; he actively prevented the Indians from being helped. http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2031992...

The point you're making is that they can't be compared because Stalin killed more people? I suppose there is a minimum number in millions that must die to be considered a terrible person?

You should read up on the relish Churchill took in killing "savages". Read Late Victorian Holocausts too.