Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by DiabloD3 3799 days ago
Important food source for fish and birds for quite a few species.

Wiping them out would be a serious error.

2 comments

Important food source or only food source?
ak217 pointed out this article in Nature from 2015 - http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100721/full/466432a.html (emphasis mine):

> Many species of insect, spider, salamander, lizard and frog would also lose a primary food source. In one study published last month, researchers tracked insect-eating house martins at a park in Camargue, France, after the area was sprayed with a microbial mosquito-control agent1. They found that the birds produced on average two chicks per nest after spraying, compared with three for birds at control sites.

> Most mosquito-eating birds would probably switch to other insects that, post-mosquitoes, might emerge in large numbers to take their place. Other insectivores might not miss them at all: bats feed mostly on moths, and less than 2% of their gut content is mosquitoes. "If you're expending energy," says medical entomologist Janet McAllister of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Fort Collins, Colorado, "are you going to eat the 22-ounce filet-mignon moth or the 6-ounce hamburger mosquito?"

> With many options on the menu, it seems that most insect-eaters would not go hungry in a mosquito-free world. There is not enough evidence of ecosystem disruption here to give the eradicators pause for thought.

>Important food source for fish and birds for quite a few species.

This is not true, and it's irresponsible to repeat it as fact.