|
|
|
|
|
by theWold
3808 days ago
|
|
I came here to say that, but in a slightly different way: True: > no discussion of how one might interpret this model, what its assumptions are, and how to assess validity or fit? Quoting OP from the comments in his blog: > Hey Victor, thanks for reading! You’re absolutely right, I should have taken some time to talk about the assumptions of linear regression. I tried to mention them in passing, but I’ll try to be more explicit next time. I should have brought up the pearson correlation coefficient. I tried to write this from a more machine learning point of view, not as much statistics. Either way it was a decently written post and would read more in the future (though I would like to see more statistics side of things rather than just me thinking Alex here is waving his hands saying 'you see nothing!' when we look at the mathematical assumptions / 'pure' statistics). In other thoughts: I'm currently in the process of writing a blog series on the analytics of Firearm projectiles (What ammo is most accurate from a Ruger American 308 Win.). Seeing other statistical posts like this help me figure out how to make mine better. So thanks Alex! |
|