|
|
|
|
|
|
by baghira
3803 days ago
|
|
|
It is a rebuttal to the implication that the possibility of the community electing some nefarious personality should be considered valid ground for denying said community any representation. By the same token a bunch of corporations should be denied one.
I didn't interpret the post as call for reformed governance, unless you consider 1. Deny individual
representation 2. ??? 3. Governance problems fixed! a plan (yeah, I'm being snarky, sorry). |
|
|