|
|
|
|
|
by scarmig
3807 days ago
|
|
I'll go with "Putin-apologist." Why act like pointing out an obvious motive is the focus or even a main point of the report? What about substantive points like: "Traces of the isotope were later found in many of the same places where the two alleged killers had visited: The hotel's bathroom, their hotel room, a board room where they conducted an earlier meeting and the plane they traveled aboard." We're not talking about traces of carbon or lead, here. |
|