[pc86]

Well I'm a married heterosexual man, so the universe of "hot guys I like" is pretty small.

And I don't know why you insist on continuing to argue against points I'm not making. I'm saying continued unwanted advances = harassment, regardless of the existence or lack of "clear rejection." If you flirt with someone at work (what exactly are you being paid to do?) and they reciprocate, it's not unwanted. If you do it once and they don't reciprocate, and you stop, it's not continued.

[isnullorempty]

So it's not the act that's harassment, it's the relative level of attractiveness of the person committing the act. Interesting.

[pc86]

You are either being willfully ignorant or a troll (or both). Nowhere did I even intimate that attractiveness has anything to do with anything.

> I'm saying continued unwanted advances = harassment

[isnullorempty]

Reciprocation will be more likely if the person making the advance is more attractive relative to target of the advance. I'm sure there is a mathematical formula for this.