i assume that it's comparable to kilim, but have limited experience
Comsat (one of the servers in my benchmark i linked) is written by the same people and uses Quasar. so eg Comsat Jetty is an async jetty servlet with a bridge to a Quasar fiber-based handler. the performance in my simplistic test wasn't great (async jetty was 50% faster than comsat jetty) - i don't know if that's representative
for my database i was initially worried about the LGPL license for Quasar, but the guys assured me that it's not viral in this usage and i think they're correct
pron (one of the developers) is active posting on HN and has written some very good/knowledgeable stuff about java, so i suspect that Quasar is technically solid. i do plan on doing an integration with my database at some point and i'll write up my results and post them on HN
Comsat (one of the servers in my benchmark i linked) is written by the same people and uses Quasar. so eg Comsat Jetty is an async jetty servlet with a bridge to a Quasar fiber-based handler. the performance in my simplistic test wasn't great (async jetty was 50% faster than comsat jetty) - i don't know if that's representative
however, it's very easy to work with and mimics the Jetty API, which is really nice. https://github.com/nqzero/jempower/blob/master/comsat/src/ma...
for my database i was initially worried about the LGPL license for Quasar, but the guys assured me that it's not viral in this usage and i think they're correct
pron (one of the developers) is active posting on HN and has written some very good/knowledgeable stuff about java, so i suspect that Quasar is technically solid. i do plan on doing an integration with my database at some point and i'll write up my results and post them on HN