|
|
|
|
|
by ericglyman
3814 days ago
|
|
Founder here. Definitely a common first reaction, but we've found that on average shoppers become far more loyal (and spend more, growing store top-line & often net bottom line) when this happens. You might think we're crazy, but we fully believe (and have data to back up) that we're helping these stores far more than the costs. |
|
One thing you should listen to is the number of people who want a reserve price (transaction threshold). This price setting is pure economic gold as information goes -- it tells you their risk aversion (probably) and the shape of their utility curve for extra income. I'm sure it correlates with income, and gives independent verification of income, statistically.
If you have 5 big retailers using your app feature internally, offer to build them a network they can join, to make their rebate offer even more attractive to participants.
With the stores' aid, you can circumvent the problems with email permissions, which frankly are going to limit your adoption. You are far better off working with the stores in a partnership I think, and helping them to understand their own customers' reserve price (and hence propensity for returns and chargebacks, which they surely care about), than being a 'gotcha' adversary.
Added link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expected_utility_hypothesis